A vacancy is the one chance to redesign a role without disrupting anyone. Two weeks. One fixed fee. You'll know what's automatable, what isn't, and what to hire for instead.
Worst case, you hire anyway — with a sharper job spec and a clear map of the role. Keep recruiting in parallel; the review doesn't delay anything.
The role broken into its real tasks, with estimated hours per week on each — built from the job spec, manager interviews and any handover material. Most roles surprise their own managers here.
Every task rated: automatable now, automatable with human review, AI-assisted, or genuinely human. With the specific tool or approach named for each — not "use AI".
The job ad rewritten around what remains. Often that's a smaller fraction of a full-time role, a more senior skill set, or a merge into a role you already have.
Hiring as planned versus the redesigned role plus automation, side by side, with the payback period — so the decision is a numbers decision, not a hunch.
Quick wins separated from bigger builds, what we'd build versus what your own team can do, with indicative pricing for both paths.
We take the job spec and interview the manager and the people who work alongside the role. What the ad says and what the job is are rarely the same thing.
We map the automation options against the real tasks — and test the important ones against your actual systems and documents, so the assessment is evidence, not opinion.
You get the report and a working session to decide: redesign the role, build the automation, or hire exactly as planned — but now you'll know.
Reviewing a whole process rather than a single role? See the six-week Agent Build →
If the review finds work worth automating, you get a fixed price for the build with the report — scoped from the review's own numbers, not a sales estimate. The review fee comes off that bill in full. If the numbers say hire, we tell you to hire, and the review still leaves you a sharper job spec.
No. Keep recruiting in parallel — the review runs in two weeks, which is usually less time than it takes to shortlist. Worst case, you hire on schedule with a sharper job spec. Best case, you stop a hire you didn't need.
Then you'll know, for a fixed fee — and you keep the task map and the rewritten role spec either way, which makes the hire better regardless. We'd rather tell you "hire as planned" than sell you an automation that won't pay back. That honesty is the product.
Roles heavy in repeatable digital work: accounts payable and receivable, admin, coordination, reporting, customer service, data entry. Judgment-heavy and relationship-heavy roles automate less — and the review tells you exactly which parts are which, so you hire for the human parts.
Either path works. We build it — typical role automations run from about $20,000, priced in the roadmap before you commit — or we hand your team the roadmap and they build it internally. The review prices both, and the review fee is credited if we build.
Anything we build works inside your existing systems under its own limited login. It touches only what you allow. A person reviews anything it's unsure about. Every action is logged, so you can see exactly what happened. During the review itself we handle your documents under NDA and delete them when we're done.
A 30-minute call is enough to scope the role and fix the fee. If it's not a fit, we'll tell you on the call.
Book a role review